Re: Performance Testing MD-RAID10 with 1 failed drive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Reindl, All

Thanks for your reply. I do understand that. Could you please help me
understand how much hit can the write takes in such a scenario.
Any resources on how to benchmark this ?


On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 2:30 AM Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 19.10.22 um 21:30 schrieb Umang Agarwalla:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We run Linux RAID 10 in our production with 8 SAS HDDs 7200RPM.
> > We recently got to know from the application owners that the writes on
> > these machines get affected when there is one failed drive in this
> > RAID10 setup, but unfortunately we do not have much data around to
> > prove this and exactly replicate this in production.
> >
> > Wanted to know from the people of this mailing list if they have ever
> > come across any such issues.
> > Theoretically as per my understanding a RAID10 with even a failed
> > drive should be able to handle all the production traffic without any
> > issues. Please let me know if my understanding of this is correct or
> > not.
>
> "without any issue" is nonsense by common sense



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux