Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 11:08 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Song
>
> 在 2022/09/01 2:00, Song Liu 写道:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 6:03 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> patch 1 is a small problem found by code review.
> >> patch 2 avoid holding resync_lock in fast path.
> >> patch 3 avoid holding lock in wake_up() in fast path.
> >>
> >> Test environment:
> >>
> >> Architecture: aarch64
> >> Cpu: Huawei KUNPENG 920, there are four numa nodes
> >>
> >> Raid10 initialize:
> >> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level 10 --bitmap none --raid-devices 4 /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1 /dev/nvme3n1
> >>
> >> Test cmd:
> >> fio -name=0 -ioengine=libaio -direct=1 -group_reporting=1 -randseed=2022 -rwmixread=70 -refill_buffers -filename=/dev/md0 -numjobs=16 -runtime=60s -bs=4k -iodepth=256 -rw=randread
> >>
> >> Test result:
> >> before this patchset:   2.9 GiB/s
> >> after this patchset:    6.6 Gib/s
> >
> > Nice work! Applied to md-next.
>
> Can you drop this version? There are something to improve. I can send a
> new version.

Sure, I will drop it from md-next.

Song




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux