On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:27:04AM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 12:18 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 12:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022, at 11:41 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > >> > >>> OK, can you post the blk-mq debugfs log after you trigger it on v5.17? > > Same boot, 3rd log. But the load is above 300 so I kinda need to sysrq+b soon. > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1375H558kqPTdng439rvG6LuXXWPXLToo/view?usp=sharing > Also please test the following one too: diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index 5ee62b95f3e5..d01c64be08e2 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -1991,7 +1991,8 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list, if (!needs_restart || (no_tag && list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch_wait.entry))) blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true); - else if (needs_restart && needs_resource) + else if (needs_restart && (needs_resource || + blk_mq_is_shared_tags(hctx->flags))) blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, BLK_MQ_RESOURCE_DELAY); blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, true); Thanks, Ming
