Re: [PATCH RESEND] raid5: fix duplicate checks for rdev->saved_raid_disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 10:19 PM Jackie Liu <liu.yun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Song.
>
> 在 2022/7/17 13:31, Song Liu 写道:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 8:11 PM Jackie Liu <liu.yun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> 'first' will always be greater than or equal to 0, it is unnecessary to
> >> repeat the 0 check, clean it up.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This looks identical to the original version. Which branch is this based on?
> > Please rebase on top of md-next branch and resend the patch:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/song/md.git/log/?h=md-next
> >
>
> The md-next branch is lower than the upstream version, v5.19-rc5
> adds a patch.
>
> commit 617b365872a247480e9dcd50a32c8d1806b21861
> Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Jun 29 13:40:57 2022 -0400
>
>      dm raid: fix KASAN warning in raid5_add_disks
>
>      There's a KASAN warning in raid5_add_disk when running the LVM
> testsuite.
>      The warning happens in the test
>      lvconvert-raid-reshape-linear_to_raid6-single-type.sh. We fix the
> warning
>      by verifying that rdev->saved_raid_disk is within limits.
>
>      Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
>      Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index ba289411f26f..20e53b167f81 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -8065,6 +8065,7 @@ static int raid5_add_disk(struct mddev *mddev,
> struct md_rdev *rdev)
>           */
>          if (rdev->saved_raid_disk >= 0 &&
>              rdev->saved_raid_disk >= first &&
> +           rdev->saved_raid_disk <= last &&
>              conf->disks[rdev->saved_raid_disk].rdev == NULL)
>                  first = rdev->saved_raid_disk;
>
> ...
> can you rebase from upstream? Thanks.

ah, I see. Now it works. No need to resend.

Thanks,
Song




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux