On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:09 AM Jackie Liu <liu.yun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@xxxxxxxxxx> > > 'first' will always be greater than or equal to 0, it is unnecessary to > repeat the 0 check, clean it up. > > Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@xxxxxxxxxx> For some reason, the patch won't apply. Could you please resend? Thanks, Song > --- > drivers/md/raid5.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c > index 20e53b167f81..a0b38a0ea9c3 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c > @@ -8063,8 +8063,7 @@ static int raid5_add_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev) > * find the disk ... but prefer rdev->saved_raid_disk > * if possible. > */ > - if (rdev->saved_raid_disk >= 0 && > - rdev->saved_raid_disk >= first && > + if (rdev->saved_raid_disk >= first && > rdev->saved_raid_disk <= last && > conf->disks[rdev->saved_raid_disk].rdev == NULL) > first = rdev->saved_raid_disk; > -- > 2.25.1 >
