Fix spelling of dones't and waitting in comments.
Fix tense mistakes of hold and finsh in comments.
Use underline to connecting reconfig and mutex.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 83c184eddbda..8d5154d94f86 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct r5l_log {
* reclaimed. if it's 0, reclaim spaces
* used by io_units which are in
* IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END state (eg, reclaim
- * dones't wait for specific io_unit
+ * doesn't wait for specific io_unit
* switching to IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END
* state) */
wait_queue_head_t iounit_wait;
@@ -1326,12 +1326,12 @@ static void r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(struct r5l_log *log,
* Discard could zero data, so before discard we must make sure
* superblock is updated to new log tail. Updating superblock (either
* directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md thread) must hold
- * reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with
- * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting
- * for all IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim
- * thread is calling this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So
+ * reconfig_mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with
+ * reconfig_mutex held. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waiting
+ * for all IO to finish, hence waiting for reclaim thread, while reclaim
+ * thread is calling this function and waiting for reconfig_mutex. So
* there is a deadlock. We workaround this issue with a trylock.
- * FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex
+ * FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig_mutex
*/
set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_DEVS) | BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
--
2.34.1
