On 6/14/22 10:11 AM, Nigel Croxon wrote:
On 4/18/22 1:44 PM, Nigel Croxon wrote:
This reverts commit 546047688e1c64638f462147c755b58119cabdc8.
The change from commit mdadm: fix coredump of mdadm
--monitor -r broke the printing of the return message when
passing -r to mdadm --manage, the removal of a device from
an array.
If the current code reverts this commit, both issues are
still fixed.
The original problem reported that the fix tried to address
was: The --monitor -r option requires a parameter,
otherwise a null pointer will be manipulated when
converting to integer data, and a core dump will appear.
The original problem was really fixed with:
60815698c0a Refactor parse_num and use it to parse optarg.
Which added a check for NULL in 'optarg' before moving it
to the 'increments' variable.
New issue: When trying to remove a device using the short
argument -r, instead of the long argument --remove, the
output is empty. The problem started when commit
546047688e1c was added.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. create/assemble /dev/md0 device
2. mdadm --manage /dev/md0 -r /dev/vdxx
Actual results:
Nothing, empty output, nothing happens, the device is still
connected to the array.
The output should have stated "mdadm: hot remove failed
for /dev/vdxx: Device or resource busy", if the device was
still active. Or it should remove the device and print
a message:
mdadm: set /dev/vdd faulty in /dev/md0
mdadm: hot removed /dev/vdd from /dev/md0
The following commit should be reverted as it breaks
mdadm --manage -r.
commit 546047688e1c64638f462147c755b58119cabdc8
Author: Wu Guanghao <wuguanghao3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Aug 16 15:24:51 2021 +0800
mdadm: fix coredump of mdadm --monitor -r
-Nigel
Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
ReadMe.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ReadMe.c b/ReadMe.c
index 8f873c48..bec1be9a 100644
--- a/ReadMe.c
+++ b/ReadMe.c
@@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ char Version[] = "mdadm - v" VERSION " - "
VERS_DATE EXTRAVERSION "\n";
* found, it is started.
*/
-char
short_options[]="-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqbc:i:l:p:m:r:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:safRSow1tye:k";
+char
short_options[]="-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqbc:i:l:p:m:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sarfRSow1tye:k:";
char short_bitmap_options[]=
-
"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:r:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sarfRSow1tye:k:";
+
"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sarfRSow1tye:k:";
char short_bitmap_auto_options[]=
-
"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:r:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sa:rfRSow1tye:k:";
+
"-ABCDEFGIQhVXYWZ:vqb:c:i:l:p:m:n:x:u:c:d:z:U:N:sa:rfRSow1tye:k:";
struct option long_options[] = {
{"manage", 0, 0, ManageOpt},
Jes, That is the status of this patch?
Thanks, Nigel
Jes, Is there an issue with reverting this patch?
-Nigel
