On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > Comments in the code document special values used for > mddev->curr_resync. Make this clearer by using an enum to label these > values. > > The only functional change is a couple places use the wrong comparison > operator that implied 3 is another special value. They are all > fixed to imply that 3 or greater is an active resync. This already looks good, but shouldn't the curr_resync also be changed to the new enum type? Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
