On Wed, 06 Apr 2022, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> [Please Cc me, I am not subscribed to the list]
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a question about original/alternate layout enforcement for RAID0
> arrays with members of different sizes introduced by commits
> c84a1372df929033cb1a0441fb57bd3932f39ac9 ("md/raid0: avoid RAID0 data
> corruption due to layout confusion.)" and
> 33f2c35a54dfd75ad0e7e86918dcbe4de799a56c ("md: add feature flag
> MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT").
>
> The layout is irrelevant if all members have the same size so the array
> has only one zone. But isn't it also irrelevant if the array has two
> zones and the second zone has only one device, for example if the array
> has two members of different sizes ?
>
Yes.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
