Re: [dm-devel] Proper way to test RAID456?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



CC'ing linux-raid mailing list, where md raid development happens.
dm-raid is just a different interface to md raid.

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:30:56 +0800
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Recently I'm working on refactor btrfs raid56 (with long term objective
> to add proper journal to solve write-hole), and the coverage of current
> fstests for btrfs RAID56 is not that ideal.
>
> Is there any project testing dm/md RAID456 for things like
> re-silvering/write-hole problems?
>
> And how you dm guys do the tests for stacked RAID456?
>
> I really hope to learn some tricks from the existing, tried-and-true
> RAID456 implementations, and hopefully to solve the known write-hole
> bugs in btrfs.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>



--





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux