Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.11.2021 15:37, Keith Busch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:34:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:32:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> I also wonder if it would be useful (since we're already having a
> discussion elsewhere about data integrity syscalls for pmem) to be able
> to call this sort of thing against files?  In which case we'd want
> another preadv2 flag or something, and then plumb all that through the
> vfs/iomap as needed?

IFF we do this (can't answer if there is a need) we should not
overload read with it.  It is an operation that does not return
data but just a status, so let's not get into that mess.

If there is a need for this, a new io_uring opcode seems like the
appropirate user facing interface for it.

+1 to this. I was looking at the patchset yesterday and this was one of
the questions I had. Any reasons to not do it this way Chaitanya?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux