Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] last batch of add_disk() error handling conversions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:06:07AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2021/10/22 1:38, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > I rebased Tetsuo Handa's patch onto the latest linux-next as this
> > series depends on it, and so I am sending it part of this series as
> > without it, this won't apply. Tetsuo, does the rebase of your patch
> > look OK?
> 
> OK, though I wanted my fix to be sent to upstream and stable before this series.

Sure, absolutely, your patch is certainly separate and is needed as a
fix downstream to stable it would seem.

> > If it is not too much trouble, I'd like to ask for testing for the
> > ataflop changes from Michael Schmitz, if possible, that is he'd just
> > have to merge Tetsuo's rebased patch and the 2nd patch in this series.
> > This is all rebased on linux-next tag 20211020.
> 
> Yes, please.
> 
> After this series, I guess we can remove "bool registered[NUM_DISK_MINORS];" like below
> due to (unit[drive].disk[type] != NULL) == (unit[drive].registered[type] == true).

Sounds good.

> Regarding this series, setting unit[drive].registered[type] = true in ataflop_probe() is
> pointless because atari_floppy_cleanup() checks unit[i].disk[type] != NULL for calling
> del_gendisk().

I see, will fix.

> And we need to fix __register_blkdev() in driver/block/floppy.c because
> floppy_probe_lock is pointless.

Sure, I take it you're going to work on a patch?

So much excitement with the floppy world, who would have thought? :)

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux