Hi Song It can improve the performance. It needs to add rcu lock when calling rcu_dereference. Now it has a bug. It doesn't use rcu lock to protect. In the second loop, it doesn't need to use rcu_dereference when getting rdev. So to resolve this bug, we can remove rcu_dereference directly. Best Regards Xiao On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 12:50 AM Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:02 PM Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In the first loop of function raid10_handle_discard. It already > > determines which disk need to handle discard request and add the > > rdev reference count. So the conf->mirrors will not change until > > all bios come back from underlayer disks. It doesn't need to use > > rcu_dereference to get rdev. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Will we get performance benefits from this change? If not, I would > prefer to keep the code as-is. > > Thanks, > Song > > > --- > > drivers/md/raid10.c | 5 ++--- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c > > index 16977e8..cef9869 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c > > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c > > @@ -1743,9 +1743,8 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio) > > for (disk = 0; disk < geo->raid_disks; disk++) { > > sector_t dev_start, dev_end; > > struct bio *mbio, *rbio = NULL; > > - struct md_rdev *rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[disk].rdev); > > - struct md_rdev *rrdev = rcu_dereference( > > - conf->mirrors[disk].replacement); > > + struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[disk].rdev; > > + struct md_rdev *rrdev = conf->mirrors[disk].replacement; > > > > /* > > * Now start to calculate the start and end address for each disk. > > -- > > 2.7.5 > > >