Re: raid10 redundancy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Phillip,

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:28:52AM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Andy Smith writes:
> > While the *layout* would be identical to RAID-1 in this case, there
> > is the difference that a single threaded read will come from both
> > devices with RAID-10, right?
> 
> No, since the data is not striped, you would get *worse* performance if
> you tried to do that.

Are you absolutely sure about this? Previous posts from Neil and
others seem to contradict you:

    https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg47219.html
    https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg47240.html

and what I have tested and observed in the past backs up the theory
that a single threaded read against a Linux RAID-10 can use n
devices whereas a single-threaded read against Linux RAID-1 will
only use 1 device.

Cheers,
Andy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux