On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:39 AM Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 02/04/2021 04:12 PM, Song Liu wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:42 PM Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Song > >> > >> Please ignore the v2 version. There is a place that needs to be fix. > >> I'll re-send > >> v2 version again. > > What did you change in the new v2? Removing "extern" in the header? > > For small changes like this, I can just update it while applying the patches. > > If we do need resend (for bigger changes), it's better to call it v3. > > Yes, it only removes "extern" in patch1. > > > > I was testing the first v2 in the past hour or so, it looks good in the test. > > I will take a closer look tomorrow. On the other hand, we are getting close > > to the 5.12 merge window, so it is a little too late for bigger > > changes like this. > > Therefore, I would prefer to wait until 5.13. If you need it in 5.12 for some > > reason, please let me know. > Is md-next a branch that is used before merging? If so, could you merge > the patches > to md-next if your test pass? There is a bug that needs to be fixed in > rhel. We can > backport the patches if you merge the patches to md-next. Yes, I can apply them to md-next. But I rebase it from time to time, so the hash tag will change. Thanks, Song
