Re: [RFC PATCH] badblocks: Improvement badblocks_set() for handling multiple ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/12/2020 09:46, Coly Li wrote:
Currently blocks/badblocks.c is used by md raid and nvdimm code, and the
badblocks table is irrelevant to any of these two subsystems.

Good to know.

If there will be better code for similar or better functionality, it
should be cool. For me, if the reporting bug is fixed, no difference in
my view:-)

Hopefully that will improve the badblocks handling in md. Sounds like that could in part be the problems we've been seeing.

If I integrate dm-integrity into md, badblocks should be mutually exclusive with it, but because dm-integrity is both a performance and disk-space hit, people might well not want to enable it.

Cheers,
Wol



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux