Re: RE Array size dropped from 40TB to 7TB when upgrading to 5.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 21:08 +0100, Ian Kumlien wrote:
> the same thing happened to me, but it was a raid6...
With the same kernel (5.10) or an older one?

> Eventually I just gave up and did a:
> mdadm --grow /dev/md3 --size=max (since it reflects the size it used to be)
This doesn't removed your data?
I wondering if the flag --assume-clean is mandatory to keep the data untouched.

> After a few hours of syncing, everything was ok again
> (according to btrfs check which also took a few hours =))
> 
> But remember to do this with a 5.0.1 kernel ;)
You mean 5.10?

Regards,

Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux