On 8/2/20 8:46 PM, tyranastrasz@xxxxxx wrote:
On 02.08.20 22:50, antlists wrote:
No, I have the disks in my pc.
The server can't boot the disks because Intel Storage says the raid has
a failure, because one of the disks has no raid information. But as I
read them both yesterday they had, now (see the last attachment) one of
them has none.
It makes no sense... I need the files
Intel means "yeah make a new raid, with data loss" that's no option.
Nara
I tried something what was told here
https://askubuntu.com/questions/69086/mdadm-superblock-recovery
root@Nibler:~# mdadm --create /dev/md0 -v -f -l 0 -c 128 -n 2 /dev/sdd
/dev/sdb
OH SHIT !!!
You didn't try booting with a rescue disk? That mistake could well cost
you the array :-( I'm out of my depth ...
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid#When_Things_Go_Wrogn
I've called in the heavy cavalry, and fortunately with 1.2 the damage
might not be too bad.
Here's hoping,
Wol
What do you mean with 1.2?
Should I do?
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Recovering_a_damaged_RAID
I wait for an answer so I do it not more complicated :/
But is it not possible to merge both disks together into a virtual one,
block by block?
Our put the old superblock back?
I dunno what's the best solution.
Thanks
Nara
Oy. I don't mind being called a "big gun", but I've zero experience
with IMSM / software raid combinations. Not even a sparkler for you, sorry.
I avoid any form of "fakeraid" as too dangerous to play with. I
understand it is necessary if you wish to dual boot windows and linux on
the same raid, but I don't do the former at all any more (no bare metal
windows in my life for over a decade, now).
):
Phil
