Revised: [PATCH] mdadm: detect too-small device: error rather than underflow/crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Revised: [PATCH] mdadm: detect too-small device: error rather than underflow/crash
From: dfavro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 08:24:58 -0400
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Forgive me, I didn't at first notice your additional comments on
the code.  I have now incorporated your comments on style; now I
think I got it right and respectfully resubmit the patch.

Please let me know if you have any additional feedback.

Thanks,
David

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] Detect too-small device: error rather than underflow/crash
  - From: dfavro

Prev by Date: Re: WD Red drives are now SMR drives?
Next by Date: [PATCH] Detect too-small device: error rather than underflow/crash
Previous by thread: failed disks, mapper, and "Invalid argument"
Next by thread: [PATCH] Detect too-small device: error rather than underflow/crash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux