Re: Raid-6 won't boot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



were you doing a reshape when it was rebooted?    And if so did you
have to use an external file when doing the reshape and were was that
file?   I think there is a command to restart a reshape using an
external file.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:13 AM Alexander Shenkin <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> quick followup: trying a stop and assemble results in the message that
> it "Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry".
>
> On 3/31/2020 11:08 AM, Alexander Shenkin wrote:
> > Thanks Roger,
> >
> > It seems only the Raid1 module is loaded.  I didn't find a
> > straightforward way to get that module loaded... any suggestions?  Or,
> > will I have to find another livecd that contains raid456?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Allie
> >
> > On 3/30/2020 9:45 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> >> They all seem to be there, all seem to report all 7 disks active, so
> >> it does not appear to be degraded. All event counters are the same.
> >> Something has to be causing them to not be scanned and assembled at
> >> all.
> >>
> >> Is the rescue disk a similar OS to what you have installed?  If it is
> >> you might try a random say fedora livecd and see if it acts any
> >> different.
> >>
> >> what does fdisk -l /dev/sda look like?
> >>
> >> Is the raid456 module loaded (lsmod | grep raid)?
> >>
> >> what does cat /proc/cmdline look like?
> >>
> >> you might also run this:
> >> file -s /dev/sd*3
> >> But I think it is going to show us the same thing as what the mdadm
> >> --examine is reporting.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:05 PM Alexander Shenkin <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> See attached.  I should mention that the last drive i added is on a new
> >>> controller that is separate from the other drives, but seemed to work
> >>> fine for a bit, so kinda doubt that's the issue...
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> allie
> >>>
> >>> On 3/30/2020 6:21 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> >>>> do this against each partition that had it:
> >>>>
> >>>>  mdadm --examine /dev/sd***
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems like it is not seeing it as a md-raid.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:13 AM Alexander Shenkin <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> Thanks Roger,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only line that isn't commented out in /etc/mdadm.conf is "DEVICE
> >>>>> partitions"...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Allie
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 3/30/2020 4:53 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> >>>>>> That seems really odd.  Is the raid456 module loaded?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On mine I see messages like this for each disk it scanned and
> >>>>>> considered as maybe possibly being an array member.
> >>>>>>  kernel: [   83.468700] md/raid:md13: device sdi3 operational as raid disk 5
> >>>>>> and messages like this:
> >>>>>>  md/raid:md14: not clean -- starting background reconstruction
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You might look at /etc/mdadm.conf on the rescue cd and see if it has a
> >>>>>> DEVICE line that limits what is being scanned.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:13 AM Alexander Shenkin <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Thanks Roger,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> that grep just returns the detection of the raid1 (md127).  See dmesg
> >>>>>>> and mdadm --detail results attached.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Many thanks,
> >>>>>>> allie
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 3/28/2020 1:36 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Try this grep:
> >>>>>>>> dmesg | grep "md/raid", if that returns nothing if you can just send
> >>>>>>>> the entire dmesg.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:47 AM Alexander Shenkin <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Roger.  dmesg has nothing in it referring to md126 or md127....
> >>>>>>>>> any other thoughts on how to investigate?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> allie
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 3/27/2020 3:55 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> A non-assembled array always reports raid1.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I would run "dmesg | grep md126" to start with and see what it reports it saw.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:29 AM Alexander Shenkin <al@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Wol,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Booting in SystemRescueCD and looking in /proc/mdstat, two arrays are
> >>>>>>>>>>> reported.  The first (md126) in reported as inactive with all 7 disks
> >>>>>>>>>>> listed as spares.  The second (md127) is reported as active
> >>>>>>>>>>> auto-read-only with all 7 disks operational.  Also, the only
> >>>>>>>>>>> "personality" reported is Raid1.  I could go ahead with your suggestion
> >>>>>>>>>>> of mdadm --stop array and then mdadm --assemble, but I thought the
> >>>>>>>>>>> reporting of just the Raid1 personality was a bit strange, so wanted to
> >>>>>>>>>>> check in before doing that...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Allie
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/26/2020 10:00 PM, antlists wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/03/2020 17:07, Alexander Shenkin wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I surely need to boot with a rescue disk of some sort, but from there,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure exactly when I should do.  Any suggestions are very welcome!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Okay. Find a liveCD that supports raid (hopefully something like
> >>>>>>>>>>>> SystemRescueCD). Make sure it has a very recent kernel and the latest
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mdadm.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> All being well, the resync will restart, and when it's finished your
> >>>>>>>>>>>> system will be fine. If it doesn't restart on its own, do an "mdadm
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --stop array", followed by an "mdadm --assemble"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If that doesn't work, then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid#When_Things_Go_Wrogn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Wol



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux