Re: Raid recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you François for your answer.
now the drives are connected to an hp workstation - Intel® Xeon(R) CPU
E5430 @ 2.66GHz × 4
I have a dual boot on machine with win 7 ultimate and Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
I think I put my drives in the correct  order based on the logs from
my NAS and this is the point were I am in this moment

root@Raid-on:~# mdadm --detail --scan
INACTIVE-ARRAY /dev/md127 metadata=1.2 name=7c6ee8d2:data-0
UUID=ba35c20f:00e99fb7:438a7341:dd60ea4a
INACTIVE-ARRAY /dev/md126 metadata=1.2 name=7c6ee8d2:1
UUID=404db06b:8e589748:2642bc94:76d8d451
ARRAY /dev/md/0 metadata=1.2 name=7c6ee8d2:0
UUID=e2babf7a:61021c07:01c4cc7d:6850366d
INACTIVE-ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=1.2 name=7c6ee8d2:1
UUID=befb8d42:405f562c:7ce1c907:0e41a61e
ARRAY /dev/md/7c6ee8d2:1_0 metadata=1.2 name=7c6ee8d2:1
UUID=1369496d:edbc2d84:9b99b7b2:77fdbacf
root@Raid-on:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5]
[raid4] [raid10]
md125 : active (auto-read-only) raid1 sdc2[1] sdb2[0]
      523712 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]

md1 : inactive sdd2[1](S)
      523760 blocks super 1.2

md0 : active raid1 sdc1[4] sdb1[6] sdd1[5] sde1[7]
      4190208 blocks super 1.2 [4/4] [UUUU]

md126 : inactive sde2[1](S)
      523760 blocks super 1.2

md127 : inactive sdc3[1](S) sdb3[0](S) sdd3[3](S) sde3[2](S)
      11701660642 blocks super 1.2

unused devices: <none>

I don't know if I use the correct version of linux or if the BTRFS is
mandatory to be installed to be able to recover the raid or at least
the data from the array
I was able to read active the raid with a windows program (reclaime)
made by some russian / ukrainian girls but the software to recover was
really expansive for a home user like me.

For this reason I am this point

thanks again for any kind of help thru this journey.

kind regards
Madalin
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:43 PM François Goudal <francois@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le 20/09/2018 à 21:22, Madalin Grosu a écrit :
> >   Hello people,
> >
> >   I already send an email regarding my problem on this list but nobody
> > answer to me until now.
> >   I try to recovery my raid after I damaged based on my lack of
> > experience with this kind of soft/hard devices.
> >   My raid is a NAS netgear 314, is software one based on debian (not
> > sure about that, but is what i read on netgear forum)
> >   Partition with data is still there, the one with file system the
> > same, only the one with Swap is partial damaged.
> >   If there is someone in the list that can help me with few answers at
> > the beginning and some assistance during the recovery process in case
> > I will stuck.
> >   Thanks in advance and I hope to hear you soon.
> >   Madalin Grosu
> Hello,
>
> Unfortunately, your Netgear NAS, although possibly based on Linux
> Debian, as you indicated, remains quite a blackbox to most people here,
> I guess.
> The terms you used such as "xraid" and "flex raid" are nothing that
> exists in Linux.
> They are probably fancy marketing names which Netgear has given to
> either a regular linux raid of some sort, or something proprietary.
>
> That being said:
>   - Do you have access to a shell (preferably a root shell) on your NAS
> device ?
>   - Do you have access to a Linux machine and do you have the
> possibility to connect all of your disks to that machine ?
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux