Re: [PATCH 1/6] Generic radix trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Kent Overstreet
<kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:16:42AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> > +/*
>> > + * Returns pointer to the specified byte @offset within @radix, allocating it if
>> > + * necessary - newly allocated slots are always zeroed out:
>> > + */
>> > +void *__genradix_ptr_alloc(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset,
>> > +                          gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct genradix_node **n;
>>
>> Any reason that " struct genradix_node ** " is used here instead of "
>> struct genradix_node * "?
>>
>> Looks like this function only manipulates *n, am I missing something?
>
> It stores to *n, when it has to allocate a node (including the root)

I see, thanks for the explanation.

thanks,
liubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux