Re: raid6 glorious failure - help (or at least a shoulder to cry on) needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/18 23:36, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
>>
>> I would, however, make sure I've blown away as much of any partition
>> remnants
> 
> Any reason why --re-add'ing sdg (as is, not blowing away anything) is
> unsafe?
> There is a bitmap so this should be the quickest way to get back some
> redundancy.
> Then diagnose sdb and deal with it.

Because sdg is AHEAD of the other drives? As I understand it, the bitmap
tells you what writes are missing from the current drive so you can
recreate them from the others. However if the current drive is *ahead*
then you need to know what writes to *throw* *away*, and I don't think
the bitmap tells you that.

I could be wrong, though ...

Cheers,
Wol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux