Re: USB-to-SATA and RAID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/23/2018 02:16 PM, Linus Lüssing wrote:
Hi,

By chance I found this statement in the Linux RAID Wiki:

"Do NOT use [USB devices] as part of your array. They have
  a timeout/disconnect mechanism which interacts very
  badly with the raid code." [0]

Could someone elaborate further on this? Does "interacts very
badly" mean that there will be potential data loss / data
corruption? Or does "very badly" just mean short, temporary
performance issues / lags upon a disk failure?

Potential data loss / data corruption.  Don't use USB.  Use eSATA instead.  The list archives of linux-raid and linux-xfs are dotted with USB disk horror stories.

Regards, Linus

[0]: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Choosing_your_hardware,_and_what_is_a_device%3F#USB_devices
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux