Re: Growing RAID10 with active XFS filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/01/18 22:01, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Yup, 21 devices in a RAID 10. That's a really nasty config for
> RAID10 which requires an even number of disks to mirror correctly.
> Why does MD even allow this sort of whacky, sub-optimal
> configuration?

Just to point out - if this is raid-10 (and not raid-1+0 which is a
completely different beast) this is actually a normal linux config. I'm
planning to set up a raid-10 across 3 devices. What happens is that is
that raid-10 writes X copies across Y devices. If X = Y then it's a
normal mirror config, if X > Y it makes good use of space (and if X < Y
it doesn't make sense :-)

SDA: 1, 2, 4, 5

SDB: 1, 3, 4, 6

SDC: 2, 3, 5, 6

Cheers,
Wol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux