Re: [PATCH] md/md: replace confusing resync progress 99.9% with new wording

[bingjingc <bingjingc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Guoqing Jiang 於 2017-12-28 16:11 寫到:
> On 12/27/2017 01:50 PM, bingjingc wrote:
> > When any sync action is finishing or interrupted, the progress will
> > show 99.9% before the sync thread is reaped. Many reporters has asked
> > what happened to the last blocks. It might be a confusing meaning for
> > users because the progress will be backward after the interrupted task
> > is restarted.
> >
> > Take a raid5 reshape for example:
> > mdadm -C --assume-clean /dev/md0 -l5 -n3 /dev/loop[012]
> > echo 2000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
> > echo 1000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min # slow down the speed
> > mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop3
> > mdadm /dev/md0 --grow -n4
> > while true
> > do
> >     mdadm -S /dev/md0
> >     sleep 3
> >     mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/loop[0123]
> > done
> >
> > And you can see the fake 99.9% progress by the following command:
> > > while true; do cat /proc/mdstat | grep reshape; done
>
> Seems it happened when the reshaping is interrupted by issue stop array 
> cmd,
> if so, why not just check MD_RECOVERY_INTR in status_resync()?

Actually, 99.9% is also not a clear statement for a finishing case. The 
last
block in array has already been processed. No blocks left are not 
processed.
The array just waits for the daemon to reap it. Maybe it can be 
displayed
as 100% (CLEANING UP). However, I just let it shows "CLEANING UP" here.

Thanks,
BingJing

> Thanks,
> Guoqing
>
> > >
> >
> > This confusing state can be fixed by exposing the real state to users.
> > And I also correct the sync action type for display.
> >
> > Reported-by: Edwin Lin <edwinlin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Allen Peng <allenpeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/md.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> > index 4e4dee0..74106c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> > @@ -7593,6 +7593,14 @@ static int status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, 
> > struct mddev *mddev)
> >      sector_t rt;
> >      int scale;
> >      unsigned int per_milli;
> > +    char *sync_action;
> > +
> > +    sync_action = (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery) ?
> > +        "reshape" :
> > +        (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery) ?
> > +        "check" :
> > +        (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery) ?
> > +        "resync" : "recovery")));
> >
> >      if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery) ||
> >          test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery))
> > @@ -7602,9 +7610,11 @@ static int status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, 
> > struct mddev *mddev)
> >
> >      resync = mddev->curr_resync;
> >      if (resync <= 3) {
> > -        if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery))
> > +        if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery)) {
> >              /* Still cleaning up */
> > -            resync = max_sectors;
> > +            seq_printf(seq, "\t%s=CLEANING UP", sync_action);
> > +            return 1;
> > +        }
> >      } else if (resync > max_sectors)
> >          resync = max_sectors;
> >      else
> > @@ -7612,13 +7622,13 @@ static int status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, 
> > struct mddev *mddev)
> >
> >      if (resync == 0) {
> >          if (mddev->recovery_cp < MaxSector) {
> > -            seq_printf(seq, "\tresync=PENDING");
> > +            seq_printf(seq, "\t%s=PENDING", sync_action);
> >              return 1;
> >          }
> >          return 0;
> >      }
> >      if (resync < 3) {
> > -        seq_printf(seq, "\tresync=DELAYED");
> > +        seq_printf(seq, "\t%s=DELAYED", sync_action);
> >          return 1;
> >      }
> >
> > @@ -7648,12 +7658,7 @@ static int status_resync(struct seq_file *seq, 
> > struct mddev *mddev)
> >          seq_printf(seq, "] ");
> >      }
> >      seq_printf(seq, " %s =%3u.%u%% (%llu/%llu)",
> > -           (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RESHAPE, &mddev->recovery)?
> > -            "reshape" :
> > -            (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery)?
> > -             "check" :
> > -             (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery) ?
> > -              "resync" : "recovery"))),
> > +           sync_action,
> >             per_milli/10, per_milli % 10,
> >             (unsigned long long) resync/2,
> >             (unsigned long long) max_sectors/2);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" 
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html