Re: New setup: partitions or raw devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 02.12.2017 um 14:14 schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
Il 02/12/2017 00:44, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
a RAID10 can survive two faile disks while a RAID5 is for sure dead
Absolutely not.
This is a common misconception.
RAID-10 can survive two failed disks IF AND ONLY IF these disks are on different mirrors.

i know that - thats the difference between "will" and "can"

I had multiple (more than 4) RAID-10s totally lost due to double failure in the same mirror. Each disk in a mirror will get the same write pattern, thus, you'll risk a double failure for any firmware bugs or similiar. With SSDs this risk is higher, because you wear out both members
in the same way at the same time

when you are not an idiot the mirror is not the same disk or not the same age, guess why i replaced first two of the HDD's with SSD's and somewhere next year i plan to replace the remaining two too

and for 4 disk RAID10 with HDD's i use typicaly 4 different disks at all from as many vendors as possible (the machine in the office is from a time where you had 4 real vendors)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux