Re: New setup: partitions or raw devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2017-11-29 23:10 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> a. It makes it unambiguous this drive has had some purpose, it's not a
> blank slate.
> b. GPT is unambiguous, checksummed, has redundancy, and a user
> definable partition name 72 bytes UTF-16E to make it even more
> unambiguous
> c. The MBR had too few type codes, leading to a lot of ambiguity as to
> a partition's contents, so on Linux the idea was for libblkid to have
> a thorough understanding of (most) every conceivable volume format
> signature. But GPT solves this in a more standard way, and the
> explosion of undefined volume formats and binary blobs installed on
> partitions has made keeping up with their identification in blkid
> increasingly challenging.

So, if you where me, how many gpt partition and which types would you make ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux