On Tue, Nov 14 2017 at 7:14pm -0500, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So I've pulled this, but have a question: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Mike Snitzer (1): > > md: rename some drivers/md/ files to have an "md-" prefix > > is this really sensible? I know I absolutely hate what things like > this does to tab-completion, because everything now has the same > prefix. > > And it's not like it adds any value - the "md" is already there in the > directory name. > > So honestly, if this was code that I regularly looked at (it isn't), > I'd probably not be happy. As it is, I don't really care all that > much, just wanted to check. > > Why is it "md-faulty,c", but "raid5.c", for example? > > And if it's to try to separate the "dm-xyz" vs "md-xyz" ones, maybe > making this an actual directory structure rather than a prefix would > be better? > > Just throwing this out. I see you already took the change; but regardless the idea of splitting MD and DM files into separate directories was explored briefly (by me). I stopped short of that because dm-raid.c does share code with md (see all the md includes at the top of dm-raid.c). Would require more extensive work to formalize the MD interfaces through include/linux/ which wasn't a priority to tackle. I was just after stopping the various janitor DM patch submissions from spamming linux-raid and shli. So went with the quickest way to express discrete MD and DM files within the MAINTAINERS file. Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
