Re: FW: change in disk failure policy for non-BBL arrays?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Perfect, thanks very much Artur.

Chris


On 11/6/17 3:14 AM, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
On 11/03/2017 08:58 PM, Chris Walker wrote:
Hello,
I was looking at this again today and it appears that with this change, error handling no longer works correctly in RAID10 (I haven't checked the other levels yet).  Without a BBL configured, an error cycles through fix_read_error until max_read_errors is exceeded, and only then is the drive kicked out of the array.  For example, if I inject errors in response to both read and write commands at sector 16392 of /dev/sda, logs in response to a read of the corresponding md0 sector look like:
(many repeats)
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: unable to read back corrected sectors (8 sectors at 16392 on sda)
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: failing drive
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: read correction write failed (8 sectors at 16392 on sda)
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: failing drive
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: unable to read back corrected sectors (8 sectors at 16392 on sda)
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: failing drive
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: Raid device exceeded read_error threshold [cur 21:max 20]
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: Failing raid device
Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: Disk failure on sda, disabling device.

Previously, the drive would have been failed out of the array by the call of md_error at the end of r10_sync_page_io.

Is there an appetite for a patch that takes the easy way out by reverting to the previous behavior with changes like

-       if (!rdev_set_badblocks(rdev, sector, sectors, 0))
+       if (!rdev_set_badblocks(rdev, sector, sectors, 0) || rdev->badblocks.shift < 0)
Hi,

Some time ago I sent a patch that fixed this issue but now I see that it
never got applied:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=145986120124345&w=2. I'll resend it
and hopefully it gets applied this time.

Thanks,
Artur

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux