Re: [PATCH v2] mdadm/grow: adding a test to ensure resize was required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/24/2017 12:43 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 10/12/2017 06:55 AM, Majchrzak, Tomasz wrote:
Hi Jes,

I wonder if it would be a lot of inconvenience for you to push commits on more regular basis (optimally once accepted). We run daily regression tests on upstream mdadm and frequent pushes would allow us to see problems sooner.

Hi Tomek,

I generally try to push when I apply patches. It happens I miss it, especially if it's just a single smaller patch.

I just pushed the tree now.


Hi Jes,
Yesterday I sent a v3 version in-reply-to v2 in this mail tree, maybe I shall re-send another commit
based on current head-commit?

Thanks,
-Zhilong

Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux