>>>>> "Wols" == Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Wols> On 26/09/17 16:11, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> I completely agree, I also think we shouldn't hardcode imposed layouts >> unless there are very strong reasons for it. Someone may want to put >> this into an initramfs or somewhere else and want to put it in a >> different location. Wols> Plus isn't /sbin deprecated? LOL! Wols> Iirc (very debatable :-) the end goal of the FHS is to have a Wols> read-only / with all executables in /bin. Okay it's going to Wols> take a looonngg time to get there, but if I'm right hard-coding Wols> already-deprecated standards isn't the best move. Heh heh. Wols> (Again, iirc :-) sbin stood for *static* binaries needed for Wols> system recovery, so its original purpose has long been abused Wols> ... :-) I agree. I more think of it as 'system binaries' myself. Stuff that's needed by the barebones system to just even run. But others haven't asuaged my concerns, so I think we're ok. John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
