Re: [PATCH] md: allow changing set_name of running array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:22:33PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01 2017, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:07:29AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 30 2017, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> >> > Allow changing active array's set_name. This is the only way to
> >> > safely update superblock on an array which carries a mounted fs.
> >> 
> >> Do you really need to change the set_name of an active array?
> >> 
> >> The name is only used when the array is actived, so wait until the next
> >> time the array is stopped, and change the name then.
> >> 
> >> You can boot with a rescue CD or similar and use "--assemble
> >> --update=name", or with a bit of effort you could get the normal boot
> >> sequence to change the name.
> >> 
> >> I wouldn't object to adding something to mdadm so that it would read
> >> something from mdadm.conf, and update the set name at boot time.
> >> 
> >> What is the underlying problem that you are trying to solve here?
> >
> > I had to fix /dev/md* naming on a system with no physical access.
> >
> > The problem was that despite matching mdadm.conf entries, arrays started
> > with random 127-i indexes (because superblocks' set_names didn't match
> > hostname, I guess).
> 
> That's odd.  If an array is listed in mdadm.conf, that is enough to tell
> mdadm that it is "local" so that it doesn't need the hostname to match.
> Can you show me exactly what was in your mdadm.conf?

This is what was I had when it would reassign arrays on boot. System
hostname is 'rere' - it was renamed some time after creating arrays.

---8<---
HOMEHOST <system>
MAILADDR root
ARRAY /dev/md/0  metadata=1.2 UUID=d5ea39a9:5ec27c36:c83296d4:70f879d4 name=rere2:0
ARRAY /dev/md/1  metadata=1.2 UUID=9bf69b92:2e7ba905:5f959c09:c8fecb99 name=rere2:1
---8<---

I don't have old versions of mdadm.conf, so had to recreate this one.
IIRC I verified UUIDs back then, but don't remember whether I modified
names or not. Thinking of it, how would mdadm behave if it had matching
UUIDs and mismatching array names in mdadm.conf?

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux