Re: [PATCH 5/5] testb: badblock support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:56:31PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Sometime disk could have tracks broken and data there is inaccessable,
> > but data in other parts can be accessed in normal way. MD RAID supports
> > such disks. But we don't have a good way to test it, because we can't
> > control which part of a physical disk is bad. For a virtual disk, this
> > can be easily controlled.
> >
> > This patch adds a new 'badblock' attribute. Configure it in this way:
> > echo "+1-100" > xxx/badblock, this will make sector [1-100] as bad
> > blocks.
> > echo "-20-30" > xxx/badblock, this will make sector [20-30] good
> 
> Did you happen to overlook block/badblocks.c, or did you find it unsuitable?

Hmm, I overlooked at it indeed, thought I don't need those features of
badblocks without double checking the code. Will use badblocks interface in
next post.

Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux