On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:38:19PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10 2017, Ming Lei wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:35:12AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:09 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > >> >> + > >> >> + rp->idx = 0; > >> > > >> > This is the only place the ->idx is initialized, in r1buf_pool_alloc(). > >> > The mempool alloc function is suppose to allocate memory, not initialize > >> > it. > >> > > >> > If the mempool_alloc() call cannot allocate memory it will use memory > >> > from the pool. If this memory has already been used, then it will no > >> > longer have the initialized value. > >> > > >> > In short: you need to initialise memory *after* calling > >> > mempool_alloc(), unless you ensure it is reset to the init values before > >> > calling mempool_free(). > >> > > >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196307 > >> > >> OK, thanks for posting it out. > >> > >> Another fix might be to reinitialize the variable(rp->idx = 0) in > >> r1buf_pool_free(). > >> Or just set it as zero every time when it is used. > >> > >> But I don't understand why mempool_free() calls pool->free() at the end of > >> this function, which may cause to run pool->free() on a new allocated buf, > >> seems a bug in mempool? > > > > Looks I missed the 'return' in mempool_free(), so it is fine. > > > > How about the following fix? > > It looks like it would probably work, but it is rather unusual to > initialise something just before freeing it. > > Couldn't you just move the initialization to shortly after the > mempool_alloc() call. There looks like a good place that already loops > over all the bios.... OK, follows the revised patch according to your suggestion. --- >From 68f9936635b3dda13c87a6b6125ac543145bb940 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:16:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] MD: move initialization of resync pages' index out of mempool allocator mempool_alloc() is only responsible for allocation, not for initialization, so we need to move the initialization of resync pages's index out of the allocator function. Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> Fixes: f0250618361d(md: raid10: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages) Fixes: 98d30c5812c3(md: raid1: don't use bio's vec table to manage resync pages) Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/md/raid1.c | 4 +++- drivers/md/raid10.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c index e1a7e3d4c5e4..26f5efba0504 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c @@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ static void * r1buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data) resync_get_all_pages(rp); } - rp->idx = 0; rp->raid_bio = r1_bio; bio->bi_private = rp; } @@ -2698,6 +2697,9 @@ static sector_t raid1_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, struct md_rdev *rdev; bio = r1_bio->bios[i]; + /* This initialization should follow mempool_alloc() */ + get_resync_pages(bio)->idx = 0; + rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->mirrors[i].rdev); if (rdev == NULL || test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) { diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 797ed60abd5e..5ebcb7487284 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ static void * r10buf_pool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_flags, void *data) resync_get_all_pages(rp); } - rp->idx = 0; rp->raid_bio = r10_bio; bio->bi_private = rp; if (rbio) { @@ -3095,6 +3094,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, bio = r10_bio->devs[0].bio; bio->bi_next = biolist; biolist = bio; + get_resync_pages(bio)->idx = 0; bio->bi_end_io = end_sync_read; bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0); if (test_bit(FailFast, &rdev->flags)) @@ -3120,6 +3120,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, bio = r10_bio->devs[1].bio; bio->bi_next = biolist; biolist = bio; + get_resync_pages(bio)->idx = 0; bio->bi_end_io = end_sync_write; bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0); bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = to_addr @@ -3146,6 +3147,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, break; bio->bi_next = biolist; biolist = bio; + get_resync_pages(bio)->idx = 0; bio->bi_end_io = end_sync_write; bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0); bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = to_addr + @@ -3291,6 +3293,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, atomic_inc(&r10_bio->remaining); bio->bi_next = biolist; biolist = bio; + get_resync_pages(bio)->idx = 0; bio->bi_end_io = end_sync_read; bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0); if (test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[d].rdev->flags)) @@ -3314,6 +3317,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, sector = r10_bio->devs[i].addr; bio->bi_next = biolist; biolist = bio; + get_resync_pages(bio)->idx = 0; bio->bi_end_io = end_sync_write; bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0); if (test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[d].rdev->flags)) -- 2.9.4 -- Ming -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
