Re: Disk Monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2017-06-29 16:33 GMT+02:00 Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> In other words, a patrol check looks for a failing disk. A consistency
> check looks for corrupt data. (A consistency check does a patrol check
> as a side effect, but you might not want to do just that, as it is
> computationally much more expensive. You might want to do a patrol check
> every day, and a consistency check of a weekend.)

Ok, so, if resources are not a problem, someone could only run a
consistency check and totally skip the patrol check. Right ?

What about md reliability? There are many detractors out there.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99171

One of the most common complaint is the absence of write-back cache,
and if you force a "writeback" you'll risk data loss in case of
unclean shutdown (power failure and so on)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux