On Mon, Jun 05 2017, CoolCold wrote: > Hello! > Keep testing the new box and while having not the best sync speed, > it's not the worst thing I found. > > Doing FIO testing, for RAID10 over 20 10k RPM drives, I have very bad > performance, like _45_ iops only. ... > > > Output from fio with internal write-intent bitmap: > Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)] [28.3% done] [0KB/183KB/0KB /s] [0/45/0 iops] > [eta 07m:11s] > > array definition: > [root@spare-a17484327407661 rovchinnikov]# cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md1 : active raid10 sdx[19] sdw[18] sdv[17] sdu[16] sdt[15] sds[14] > sdr[13] sdq[12] sdp[11] sdo[10] sdn[9] sdm[8] sdl[7] sdk[6] sdj[5] > sdi[4] sdh[3] sdg[2] sdf[1] sde[0] > 17580330880 blocks super 1.2 64K chunks 2 near-copies [20/20] > [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] > bitmap: 0/66 pages [0KB], 131072KB chunk > > Setting journal to be > 1) on SSD (separate drives), shows > Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)] [5.0% done] [0KB/18783KB/0KB /s] [0/4695/0 iops] > [eta 09m:31s] > 2) to 'none' (disabling) shows > Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)] [14.0% done] [0KB/18504KB/0KB /s] [0/4626/0 > iops] [eta 08m:36s] These numbers suggest that the write intent bitmap causes a 100-fold slow down. i.e. 45 iops instead of 4500 iops (roughly). That is certainly more than I would expect, so maybe there is a bug. Large RAID10 is a worst-base for bitmap updates as the bitmap is written to all devices instead of just those devices that contain the data which the bit corresponds to. So every bitmap update goes to 10 device. Your bitmap chunk size of 128M is nice and large, but making it larger might help - maybe 1GB. Still 100-fold ... that's a lot.. A potentially useful exercise would be to run a series of tests, changing the number of devices in the array from 2 to 10, changing the RAID chunk size from 64K to 64M, and changing the bitmap chunk size from 64M to 4G. In each configuration, run the same test and record the iops. (You don't need to wait for a resync each time, just use --assume-clean). Then graph all this data (or just provide the table and I'll graph it). That might provide an insight into where to start looking for the slowdown. NeilBrown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
