Re: Fault tolerance with badblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Wols Lists <antlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is totally non-trivial, especially because it says raid6 cannot
detect or correct more than one corruption, and ensuring that
additional corruption isn't introduced in the rare case is even more
non-trivial.

And can I point out that that is just one person's opinion?

Right off the bat you ask a stupid question that contains the answer

snip!

you know Chris, I've read this twice and think it's abusive. You
shouldn't do this.

Dave

--
"As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business,
the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance."

-- John Dewey





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux