Re: [RndTbl] Big-endian RAID5 recovery problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2017-05-06 NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, May 01 2017, Adam Thompson wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that the disks use the v0.90 metadata format, and
> > they came from a big-endian system, not a little-endian system.  MD 
> > superblocks *since* v0.90 are endian-agnostic, but back in v0.90,
> > the superblock was byte-order specific.
> 
> Look for "--update=byteorder" in the mdadm man page.

Doh!  Make that double-doh!  So easy, yet so hidden.  I'll request one
little tweak/feature: can the man page be updated so that that option
has the word "endian" somewhere in its description?  I think most of us
did as the first attempt at helping: man mdadm, search endian.  When
that failed, no one thought to search byteorder!  Even google didn't
fix that one, at least not for my web searches.

Thanks linux-RAID guys (especially Neil), once again you make the
difficult easy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux