On 14/04/17 02:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +
>> static inline int is_dma_buf_file(struct file *);
>>
>> struct dma_buf_list {
>
> I think the right fix here is to rename the operation to unmap_atomic
> and send out a little patch for that ASAP.
Ok, I can do that next week.
> I'd rather have separate functions for kmap vs kmap_atomic instead of
> the flags parameter. And while you're at it just always pass the 0
> offset parameter instead of adding a wrapper..
>
> Otherwise this looks good to me.
I settled on the flags because I thought the interface could be expanded
to do more things like automatically copy iomem to a bounce buffer (with
a flag). It'd also be possible to add things like vmap and
physical_address to the interface which would cover even more sg_page
users. All the implementations would then share the common offset
calculations, and switching between them becomes a matter of changing a
couple flags.
If you're still not convinced by the above arguments then I'll change
it but I did have reasons for choosing to do it this way.
I am fine with removing the offset versions. I will make that change.
Thanks,
Logan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
