On 04/06/2017 11:54 PM, Coly Li wrote:
On 2017/4/7 上午2:14, Jes Sorensen wrote:
A volunteer! A volunteer!
I don't think we need to set a firm timeline for removing code from the
kernel at this point. What we can do is implement the new interfaces via
sysfs/configfs, and then make ioctl support a config option. Down the
line it will be evident if/when we can rip out the old code, but I see
that being years away.
Not removing code, just after a timeline, new patch which adding new
interface should go into configfs.
I start to look into this now, hope to compose a first version patch set
for comments in not too long time.
Coly
Sounds good - make sure to also consult with Shaohua how it likes to see
it implemented on the kernel side.
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
