On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx> wrote: > discard request doesn't have data attached, so it's meaningless to > allocate memory and copy from original bio for behind IO. And the copy > is bogus because bio_copy_data_partial can't handle discard request. > > We don't support writesame/writezeros request so far. > > Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx> Another way is to not do write behind for discard, but both should be fine, so: Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/md/raid1.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c > index c6a671f..b7d9651 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c > @@ -1102,6 +1102,10 @@ static struct bio *alloc_behind_master_bio(struct r1bio *r1_bio, > if (!behind_bio) > goto fail; > > + /* discard op, we don't support writezero/writesame yet */ > + if (!bio_has_data(bio)) > + goto skip_copy; > + > while (i < vcnt && size) { > struct page *page; > int len = min_t(int, PAGE_SIZE, size); > @@ -1118,7 +1122,7 @@ static struct bio *alloc_behind_master_bio(struct r1bio *r1_bio, > > bio_copy_data_partial(behind_bio, bio, offset, > behind_bio->bi_iter.bi_size); > - > +skip_copy: > r1_bio->behind_master_bio = behind_bio;; > set_bit(R1BIO_BehindIO, &r1_bio->state); > > -- > 2.9.3 > -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html