On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22 2017, NeilBrown wrote: > > > Using r1_bio->sector in call_bio_endio is more > > obviously-correct than bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, > > though both should have the same value. > > > > The inc_pending() call in handle_read_error() was missing. > > One should always accompany a bio_inc_remaining. > > > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Sorry, I left an unused variable... > > NeilBrown > > Sorry again - I replied to the wrong email (not a good day...) > and gave the wrong subject. > This should be > REALLY Fix bugs in [md PATCH 10/15] md/raid1: stop using bi_phys_segment > > :-( Thanks, applied all the patches except the 'trace completion' patch. Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
