Re: [PATCH 1/2] super1: ignore failfast flag for setting device role

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> There is corner case for setting device role,
> if new device has failfast flag.
> The failfast flag should be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  super1.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
> index 882cd61..1da33ef 100644
> --- a/super1.c
> +++ b/super1.c
> @@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ static int add_to_super1(struct supertype *st, mdu_disk_info_t *dk,
>  	struct devinfo *di, **dip;
>  	bitmap_super_t *bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb) + MAX_SB_SIZE);
>  	int rv, lockid;
> +	int dk_state;
>  
>  	if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && dlm_funs_ready()) {
>  		rv = cluster_get_dlmlock(&lockid);
> @@ -1501,11 +1502,12 @@ static int add_to_super1(struct supertype *st, mdu_disk_info_t *dk,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if ((dk->state & 6) == 6) /* active, sync */
> +	dk_state &= ~(1<<MD_DISK_FAILFAST);
> +	if ((dk_state & 6) == 6) /* active, sync */
>  		*rp = __cpu_to_le16(dk->raid_disk);

This does not look right - you haven't assigned a value to dk_state, but
then start masking bits out of it.

Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux