On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:59:59AM +0100, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
> Implement the calculation of partial parity for a stripe and PPL write
> logging functionality. The description of PPL is added to the
> documentation. More details can be found in the comments in raid5-ppl.c.
>
> Attach a page for holding the partial parity data to stripe_head.
> Allocate it only if mddev has the MD_HAS_PPL flag set.
>
> Partial parity is the xor of not modified data chunks of a stripe and is
> calculated as follows:
>
> - reconstruct-write case:
> xor data from all not updated disks in a stripe
>
> - read-modify-write case:
> xor old data and parity from all updated disks in a stripe
>
> Implement it using the async_tx API and integrate into raid_run_ops().
> It must be called when we still have access to old data, so do it when
> STRIPE_OP_BIODRAIN is set, but before ops_run_prexor5(). The result is
> stored into sh->ppl_page.
>
> Partial parity is not meaningful for full stripe write and is not stored
> in the log or used for recovery, so don't attempt to calculate it when
> stripe has STRIPE_FULL_WRITE.
>
> Put the PPL metadata structures to md_p.h because userspace tools
> (mdadm) will also need to read/write PPL.
>
> Warn about using PPL with enabled disk volatile write-back cache for
> now. It can be removed once disk cache flushing before writing PPL is
> implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
... snip ...
> +struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> +ops_run_partial_parity(struct stripe_head *sh, struct raid5_percpu *percpu,
> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx)
> +{
> + int disks = sh->disks;
> + struct page **xor_srcs = flex_array_get(percpu->scribble, 0);
> + int count = 0, pd_idx = sh->pd_idx, i;
> + struct async_submit_ctl submit;
> +
> + pr_debug("%s: stripe %llu\n", __func__, (unsigned long long)sh->sector);
> +
> + /*
> + * Partial parity is the XOR of stripe data chunks that are not changed
> + * during the write request. Depending on available data
> + * (read-modify-write vs. reconstruct-write case) we calculate it
> + * differently.
> + */
> + if (sh->reconstruct_state == reconstruct_state_prexor_drain_run) {
> + /* rmw: xor old data and parity from updated disks */
> + for (i = disks; i--;) {
> + struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
> + if (test_bit(R5_Wantdrain, &dev->flags) || i == pd_idx)
> + xor_srcs[count++] = dev->page;
> + }
> + } else if (sh->reconstruct_state == reconstruct_state_drain_run) {
> + /* rcw: xor data from all not updated disks */
> + for (i = disks; i--;) {
> + struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i];
> + if (test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags))
> + xor_srcs[count++] = dev->page;
> + }
> + } else {
> + return tx;
> + }
> +
> + init_async_submit(&submit, ASYNC_TX_XOR_ZERO_DST, tx, NULL, sh,
> + flex_array_get(percpu->scribble, 0)
> + + sizeof(struct page *) * (sh->disks + 2));
Since this should be done before biodrain, should this add ASYNC_TX_FENCE flag?
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
