On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:19:14AM +0100, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:42:09AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:20:55PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > > > situations. > > > > > > Looks good. Let me know how do you want to route the patch to upstream. > > > > Greg, you previously mentioned that driver's conversions can go via your tree. Does this still apply? > > Or should I be asking maintainers to merge these patches via their trees? > > You should ask them to take them through their trees, if they have them. > I'll be glad to scoop up all of the remaining ones that get missed, or > for subsystems that do not have trees. ok, applied, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
