On 03/09/2017 10:26 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > >> On 03/09/2017 08:18 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote: >>>>> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be >>>>> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as >>>>> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental >>>>> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free >>>>> situations. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This looks OK to me. >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Chris Leech <cleech@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Thank you for review! Do you have a tree that can take this change? >> >> Hi Elena, >> >> iscsi like fcoe should go via the SCSI tree. > > Thanks Johannes! Should I resend with "Acked-by" added in order for it to be picked up? Yes I think this would be a good way to go. Byte, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
