Re: [PATCH 14/14] md-cluster: add the support for resize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 03/01/2017 03:25 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:15:24AM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
To update size for cluster raid, we need to make
sure all nodes can perform the change successfully.
However, it is possible that some of them can't do
it due to failure (bitmap_resize could fail). So
we need to consider the issue before we set the
capacity unconditionally, and we use below steps
to perform sanity check.

1. A change the size, then broadcast METADATA_UPDATED
    msg.
2. B and C receive METADATA_UPDATED change the size
    excepts call set_capacity, sync_size is not update
    if the change failed. Also call bitmap_update_sb
    to sync sb to disk.
3. A checks other node's sync_size, if sync_size has
    been updated in all nodes, then send CHANGE_CAPACITY
    msg otherwise send msg to revert previous change.
4. B and C call set_capacity if receive CHANGE_CAPACITY
    msg, otherwise pers->resize will be called to restore
    the old value.

Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt |  2 +-
  drivers/md/md-cluster.c         | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/md/md-cluster.h         |  1 +
  drivers/md/md.c                 | 21 +++++++++---
  4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt b/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt
index 38883276d31c..2663d49dd8a0 100644
--- a/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt
+++ b/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt
@@ -321,4 +321,4 @@ The algorithm is:
There are somethings which are not supported by cluster MD yet. -- update size and change array_sectors.
+- change array_sectors.
diff --git a/drivers/md/md-cluster.c b/drivers/md/md-cluster.c
index d3c024e6bfcf..75da83187c31 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md-cluster.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md-cluster.c
@@ -1147,6 +1147,80 @@ int cluster_check_sync_size(struct mddev *mddev)
  	return (my_sync_size == sync_size) ? 0 : -1;
  }
+/*
+ * Update the size for cluster raid is a little more complex, we perform it
+ * by the steps:
+ * 1. hold token lock and update superblock in initiator node.
+ * 2. send METADATA_UPDATED msg to other nodes.
+ * 3. The initiator node continues to check each bitmap's sync_size, if all
+ *    bitmaps have the same value of sync_size, then we can set capacity and
+ *    let other nodes to perform it. If one node can't update sync_size
+ *    accordingly, we need to revert to previous value.
+ */
+static void update_size(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t old_dev_sectors)
+{
+	struct md_cluster_info *cinfo = mddev->cluster_info;
+	struct cluster_msg cmsg;
+	struct md_rdev *rdev;
+	int ret = 0;
+	int raid_slot = -1;
+
+	md_update_sb(mddev, 1);
+	lock_comm(cinfo, 1);
+
+	memset(&cmsg, 0, sizeof(cmsg));
+	cmsg.type = cpu_to_le32(METADATA_UPDATED);
+	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev)
+		if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 && !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
+			raid_slot = rdev->desc_nr;
+			break;
+		}
+	if (raid_slot >= 0) {
+		cmsg.raid_slot = cpu_to_le32(raid_slot);
+		/*
+		 * We can only change capiticy after all the nodes can do it,
+		 * so need to wait after other nodes already received the msg
+		 * and handled the change
+		 */
+		ret = __sendmsg(cinfo, &cmsg);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("%s:%d: failed to send METADATA_UPDATED msg\n",
+			       __func__, __LINE__);
+			unlock_comm(cinfo);
+			return;
+		}
+	} else {
+		pr_err("md-cluster: No good device id found to send\n");
+		unlock_comm(cinfo);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * check the sync_size from other node's bitmap, if sync_size
+	 * have already updated in other nodes as expected, send an
+	 * empty metadata msg to permit the change of capacity
+	 */
+	if (cluster_check_sync_size(mddev) == 0) {
+		memset(&cmsg, 0, sizeof(cmsg));
+		cmsg.type = cpu_to_le32(CHANGE_CAPACITY);
+		ret = __sendmsg(cinfo, &cmsg);
+		if (ret)
+			pr_err("%s:%d: failed to send CHANGE_CAPACITY msg\n",
+			       __func__, __LINE__);
+		set_capacity(mddev->gendisk, mddev->array_sectors);
don't call revalidate_disk here? And why don't move the gendisk related stuff to md.c.

Thanks, I will add revalidate_disk after set_capacity. But we can't move it to md.c
since md-cluster runs a different way for resize.

--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -6503,10 +6503,7 @@ static int update_size(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t num_sectors)
  	struct md_rdev *rdev;
  	int rv;
  	int fit = (num_sectors == 0);
-
-	/* cluster raid doesn't support update size */
-	if (mddev_is_clustered(mddev))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	sector_t old_dev_sectors = mddev->dev_sectors;
if (mddev->pers->resize == NULL)
  		return -EINVAL;
@@ -6535,7 +6532,9 @@ static int update_size(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t num_sectors)
  	}
  	rv = mddev->pers->resize(mddev, num_sectors);
  	if (!rv) {
-		if (mddev->queue) {
+		if (mddev_is_clustered(mddev))
+			md_cluster_ops->update_size(mddev, old_dev_sectors);
+		else if (mddev->queue) {
  			set_capacity(mddev->gendisk, mddev->array_sectors);
  			revalidate_disk(mddev->gendisk);
  		}

You can see the path is different between common md and md-cluster, because we have to check if all the bitmaps have the same sync_size or not, then set capacity and revalidate
disk.

@@ -8753,6 +8752,18 @@ static void check_sb_changes(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
  	int role, ret;
  	char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
+ /*
+	 * If size is changed in another node then we need to
+	 * do resize as well.
+	 */
+	if (mddev->dev_sectors != le64_to_cpu(sb->size)) {
+		ret = mddev->pers->resize(mddev, le64_to_cpu(sb->size));
+		if (ret)
+			pr_info("md-cluster: resize failed\n");
+		else
+			bitmap_update_sb(mddev->bitmap);
+	}
I'm confused, who will trigger this? The patch 10 only calls set_capacity.

process_metadata_update -> md_reload_sb -> check_sb_changes, so which
means if a node received METADATA_UPDATED msg, it will call the path.

And in this patch you may see that update_size sends the msg.

+static void update_size(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t old_dev_sectors)
+{
+	struct md_cluster_info *cinfo = mddev->cluster_info;
+	struct cluster_msg cmsg;
+	struct md_rdev *rdev;
+	int ret = 0;
+	int raid_slot = -1;
+
+	md_update_sb(mddev, 1);
+	lock_comm(cinfo, 1);
+
+	memset(&cmsg, 0, sizeof(cmsg));
+	cmsg.type = cpu_to_le32(METADATA_UPDATED);

Please describe the details in each node. Also please add it to md-cluster.txt
document.

Does it help?

diff --git a/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt b/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt
index 2663d49dd8a0..709439e687c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt
+++ b/Documentation/md/md-cluster.txt
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ There are three groups of locks for managing the device:

  3.1.1 METADATA_UPDATED: informs other nodes that the metadata has
    been updated, and the node must re-read the md superblock. This is
-   performed synchronously. It is primarily used to signal device
-   failure.
+   performed synchronously. We send this message if sb is updated or
+   the size is changed.

Thanks,
Guoqing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux