Re: assistance recovering failed raid6 array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/20/2017 02:31 PM, Martin Bosner wrote:

> Is there a way tell mdadm to use sdk1 as a “active” device? And how
> can i tell the array that it should not try to recover sdm1 but set
> it active ? Is there any magic to force the state ? It might not be
> healthy for the normal use case but might be helpful for me.

No. There's no way to do that.  Short of reading the kernel code to do
hex editing on the superblock.  And since the spare status is there due
to an --add action, you can't trust that anything else there would be
safe for --create --assume-clean. You would scramble these eggs even
further.

Phil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux