RAID10 and 'writemostly' support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

i am new and was redirected to this list from the bugtracker
please have a look at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194551

currently "writemostly" seems to be only supported on "real" RAID1 while i was in hope that by the conecpt of RAID10 having more or less RAID0+RAID1 it would also work on RAID10 (and on the virtual machine wre i tested mdadm with the flag before buying the disks it did not complain)

RAID10 with "writemostly" makes a lot of sense for large storages to get them fast *and* reliable without make it extremly expensive

* you don't want RAID5/RAID6 rebuild over many TB
* very large SSD for RAID1 are much more expensive than smaller ones

so with 4x2 TB disks you get 4 TB useable storage and with "writemostly" which would be in the best case "writeonly" you have a lightening fast RAID0 on SSD with good redundancy

most workloads are read-intense with less writes (rsync with --checksum enabled, booting, starting large applications...)

another benefit: different technologies - it's very unlikely that both disks of a stripe fail at the same time or due rebuild when one half is a SSD and the other a HDD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux